The Centre for Philosophy and Critical Thought, Goldsmiths University of London

Research Centre run jointly between the Departments of Sociology and English and Comparative Literature at Goldsmiths University, London


Leave a comment

CfP: “How do we break something that is already broken?” Virtual Assembly of the Critical AI Network, CPCT (27-29 May 2026)

How do we break something that is already broken?

Virtual Assembly of the Critical AI Network, 27-29 May 2026
Centre for Philosophy and Critical Thought, Goldsmiths, University of London

Let us begin with our premise: AI is a broken technology. Despite the many hubristic claims made by its proprietary owners and amplified by the media, AI has no way to deliver on its promises to bring about societal benefits for all by increasing productivity, lowering costs, and accelerating innovation. Yet the rhetoric that surrounds AI’s incursions into our worlds of work and life has acted persuasively to cover for widespread precaritisation. Meanwhile, AI’s shoddy predictions and slop production further harm the marginalised and its immense resource demands hasten the destruction of the environment. Might we therefore not speculate that AI’s purpose is actually to break things by virtue of its very brokenness, not least any irksome movements towards racial, gender, class, or climate justice? 

AI may not be the cause of our current polycrisis but it condenses the forces that brought them about, which it then amplifies, intensifies, and adds to. A critical approach to AI rejects the inevitability of this state of affairs. Instead, a critical approach recognises AI as merely the latest broken product of an already broken system, peddled under a techno-utopian guise in a desperate attempt to persuade us that energy-guzzling machine gods are our only hope out of our predicament. We therefore posit that the entangled dynamics of AI are useful diagrams of the economic, political, and ideological syndromes that lie beneath. AI’s stuttering operations dredge up misshapen philosophies, colonial dreams and a reactionary contempt for relations of care, and put them on full display. Our approach to AI asks how we break this brokenness. How can we who are forced to inhabit the dysfunction that AI names resist AI, recompose liveable lives from within the wreckage of computational nihilism, and craft its distortions into infrastructures for the common good?

Open Call for Participants: Critical AI Virtual Assembly

This assembly is an initiative of the Critical AI Network and our email list will be the main communication channel for it. If you are interested in taking part, either as a contributor or a participant, please sign up to the list here:  https://jiscmail.ac.uk/CPCT-CRITICALAINETWORK.

The virtual assembly will take place online on 27, 28 and 29 May 2026 from 4-8pm (UK). For this inaugural event, we have identified three domains of inquiry to explore as a first step: 

A. AI in Education, AI as Education — Wednesday, 27 May 2026

How has AI been insinuated into education, and in what ways has AI been taken for education itself, overtaking, eliminating, or usurping the civic and/or intellectual purposes of formal and informal learning? What are some of your case studies of local policy and examples of lived experience we might learn from? How might we formulate the most effective counterarguments – and organizing – against the integration of AI into our curricula and delivery that address local policy and financial conditions? 

B. AI in and as Law, Governance, and Politics — Thursday, 28 May 2026

As AI creeps into normalised deployment in legal practice, policy articulation, and decision making in the guise of efficiency and accuracy, questions have yet to be posed about the impact on labour conditions and labour law, the status of evidence, the right to refuse, and the rights of those affected by AI-facilitated decisions, to name just a few. Moreover, the extent to which AI is being used to manipulate democratic elections via data harvesting, psychographic profiling, and micro-targeting, amongst other strategies, has raised seemingly unanswerable questions about the future of democracy. Indeed, is politics even possible in the age of AI? How might we set about articulating and answering some of these questions? How might we question the role of governance, whether of the state or of the institution, in mediating and facilitating the introduction of AI into all facets of our lives? 

C. The Ecology of AI, AI and the Environment — Friday, 29 May 2026

Guided by the premise that under the hood, AI is simply the same technology whether it is being introduced into education or other domains of life, we ask how we might articulate and analyze the relations forged by AI between vastly different areas that hitherto appeared to be unconnected. What insights might be gained from situating AI within an ecology? How does AI compete with others in this ecology for natural resources, and what can be done to mitigate, contain, or reverse this impact? If, as we propose, AI should be evaluated not as a tool with a use value but rather as the latest symptom of misused infrastructures, how might we articulate the counterproductivity that AI adoption represents within its ecology for any green policy? 

Our hope is to collect and publish a record of our discussions in a new blog we will be setting up for the network. 

How do I participate?

Our working premise is that by virtue of having our data mined and colluding with the training of models with or without remuneration or consent, **we are all data workers in the age of AI**. Anyone who is a data worker in this sense is invited to participate. 

There are three ways to be a part of this assembly: 

(i) We invite you to contribute short (10 minute) position papers falling within one of the domains above. We welcome and value ‘non-academic’ contributions such as local case studies, reflections on personal experience, reports from activists, amongst others. We especially encourage submissions from underrepresented voices. In order to maximize accessibility, papers will be precirculated and panel speakers will present them briefly, followed by discussion. Papers have the option of being published on our blog. 

(ii) We invite non-presenting attendees to consider participating as a note-taker at one of the sessions, with your notes published afterwards in a distilled and narrative form on our blog. 

(iii) We invite you to attend any number of our panels as a discussant

If you would like to be a part of the assembly, please fill out the form at https://forms.gle/McxCu65qz2ymBepS8 to send us: 

  1. Your preferred mode of participation ((i) presenter; (ii) note-taker; (iii) discussant). 
  2. If you selected (i) or (ii), please indicate which domain (A. AI in Education, AI as Education (27 May 2026); B. AI in and as Law, Governance, and Politics (28 May 2026); C. The Ecology of AI, AI and the Environment (29 May 2026)) you would like to either present or take notes in.
  3. If you selected (i), please include a max. 250w abstract of the paper you would like to present.
  4. Finally, for all participants, please include a brief 100w bio that includes your (academic or non-academic) institutional affiliation and position (e.g., student, professor, IT worker, curator, etc.). 

The submission deadline is Friday, 13 March 2026 at 11:59pm

How do I join the Critical AI network?

If you have received this CFP and are not already a member of our network, but would like to join and participate in the assembly, please subscribe to our mailing list at https://jiscmail.ac.uk/CPCT-CRITICALAINETWORK

Who do I contact if I have questions?

If you have questions, feel free to get in touch with the organisers: 

Dan Mcquillan (Computing) d.mcquillan [at] gold.ac.uk
Julia Ng (Literary Studies) j.ng [at] gold.ac.uk
Andres Saenz de Sicilia (Sociology) a.saenzdesicilia [at] gold.ac.uk 
Deirdre Daly (CALL) d.daly [at] gold.ac.uk
Jenny Doussan (Visual Cultures) d.doussan [at] gold.ac.uk 


Leave a comment

BOOK DISCUSSION — Resisting Erasure: Capital, imperialism, and race in Palestine — with authors Adam Hanieh and Rafeef Ziadah (11 Dec, in person)


The Centre for Philosophy and Critical Thought at Goldsmiths cordially invites you to

Resisting Erasure: Capital, imperialism, and race in Palestine (Verso 2025) 


A book discussion with authors Adam Hanieh and Rafeef Ziadah in conversation with Luca di Mambro

Thursday, 11 December 2025
3:00-5:30pm GMT 
Ben Pimlott Lecture Theatre, Goldsmiths 

[Please book here to give us an idea of numbers: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/resisting-erasure-in-palestine-tickets-1972565174537?aff=oddtdtcreator&lang=en-gb&locale=en_GB&status=30&view=listing]

Why has Palestine become a defining fault line of contemporary politics? Challenging mainstream narratives that reduce Palestine to ancient hatreds, humanitarian tragedy, or legal abstractions, Resisting Erasure places Israeli settler-colonialism within the broader historical arc of imperialism, race, and fossil capitalism in the Middle East. Resisting Erasure is a succinct and far-reaching critique of the socio-economic and political forces that sustain the Israeli settler-colonial project. An essential introduction for anyone looking to understand what Palestine reveals about the world – and what it demands of us today.

Join us for this book launch with authors Adam Hanieh (Exeter) and Rafeef Ziadah (King’s College London) in conversation with Luca di Mambro (student organiser and former Goldsmiths Students’ Union President). 

Chair: Sara Farris (Sociology / CPCT)

The event is organised in collaboration with members of the Sociology Department and the Centre for Philosophy and Critical Thought at Goldsmiths University of London.

Free and open to the public; all welcome. 

Contact: s.farris [at] gold.ac.uk 
 


Leave a comment

Arun Saldanha (U Minnesota; CPCT Visiting Professor): Sexuation and the ontology of race: notes towards a Darwin after Fanon (21 November 2025 @5pm; hybrid)


The Centre for Philosophy and Critical Thought (CPCT), Goldsmiths, cordially invites you to


Arun Saldanha (U Minnesota; CPCT Visiting Professor)

Sexuation and the ontology of race: notes towards a Darwin after Fanon

Friday, 21 November 2025 from 5-7 pm GMT
RHB 137a and online

[Click here for the Zoom registration]

Psychoanalytical theory has done systematic work to ontologize sex as the irrepressibly insistent question spurring human existence. But is there only one such question? While for obvious ethico-political reasons Lacanian theorists of race relegate it entirely to the symbolic register and to modernity, perhaps the fact bodies become objects of such strongly racialized desires indexes a second profound ontological compulsion. Perhaps, as Darwin speculates with his theory of sexual selection, the aesthetic and psychic economies of sex itself necessitate a sensitivity to phenotype. Both sexuality and kinship remain riddled by lack and misinterpretation. It is important to stress that as subset of phenotypical variation “race” is entirely contingent on European colonization and capital. The talk will end by addressing the implications of the immanent critique of evolutionary theory for a renewed politics of universality. 

About the speaker

Arun Saldanha is Professor in the School of Geography, Environment & Society at the University of Minnesota (Twin Cities) as well as Visiting Professor at CPCT in Autumn 2025. The author of Space after Deleuze (Bloomsbury, 2017) and Psychedelic White: Goa Trance and the Viscosity of Race (U of Minnesota Press, 2007) as well as co-editor of books on sexual difference, Deleuze studies, and food geographies, he is currently working on a new book tentatively titled Phenotypically: A Materialist Theory of Race, which seeks a critical “return to” Darwin after Fanon in light of a resurgence of far-right fantasies around human biology.

Contact: j.ng [at] gold.ac.uk