The Centre for Philosophy and Critical Thought, Goldsmiths University of London

Research Centre run jointly between the Departments of Sociology and English and Comparative Literature at Goldsmiths University, London


Leave a comment

phi-net announcement: ‘Against Frictionlessness’: a reading group session and a screening of Ghost Dance (1983) with director Ken McMullen (Oct 2026)


Message on behalf of phi-net, an early career network for philosophy and critical theory funded by CHASE-AHRC and co-hosted by CPCT and the Birkbeck Institute for the Moving Image (BIMI):


Dear all,

We’re delighted to bring you details of our first phi-net events as part of the network’s 2026/27 annual programme ‘Against Frictionlessness’: a reading group session and a screening of Ghost Dance (1983) with director Ken McMullen.

We’ll start with the question of the spectre as a figure of thought for philosophy and art and consider the friction and fiction of linear time described by Jacques Derrida as ‘artifactuality’.

Reading list together with details about the screening below. Please join us if you can and feel free to share widely.
All the best,
Anna, Grace and Jack
https://phinet.cargo.site/
––
Ghost Dance group-read
19th October 2026, 6:30pm
Birkbeck Malet Street, Room 253

Jacques Derrida, ‘Artifactualities’ in Jacques Derrida and Bernard Stiegler, Echographies of Television: Filmed Interviews, translated by Jennifer Bajorek (London: Polity Press, 2002), pp. 1–27

Jacques Derrida and Bernard Stiegler, ‘Spectrographies’ in Echographies of Television: Filmed Interviews, pp. 113–34

Further reading/viewing:

Jacques Derrida, excerpt from Spectres of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International, translated by Peggy Kamuf (New York and London: Routledge Classics, 2006), pp. 185–221. Republished here

Bernard Stiegler, ‘Reflections on Ghost Dance‘

Ghost Dance (1983)
Screening and Q&A
with the director Ken McMullen and collaborator Oscar Guardiola-Rivera

Birkbeck Cinema – 30th October 2026, 6.30pm
In association with Birkbeck Institute for the Moving Image (BIMI)

Book your place here

Ghosts are ubiquitous, their influence inevitable. Far from catalysing a move beyond the age of ghosts, technological advancements are bringing them out; the supernatural finds its home in myth and radio waves equally. While tech enables ghosts’ renewed visibility, our histories affirm their ever-presence. In response to social, political and psychic fragmentation, we seek to incorporate them, to internalise them and allow their unconscious to speak through our bodies. Fundamentally intertwined with the past and memory, they do not appear, they only return.

Ken McMullen’s Ghost Dance (1983) explores the ghost as the passing between boundaries, blurring the lines of history and memory, consciousness and corporeality, the primordial and the advanced. It follows two women adrift in Paris and London, dual sides of a persona that collapse into one through their interactions with one another, as they seek to find the ghosts present in the remnants of history, Marx and the Paris Commune; anthropologies of early human psychology; the shift away from tangibility through media and cinema; and the “ghost in the machine” that speaks through the answerphone. The narrative flows from Pascale’s discussions with Jacques Derrida on what it means to be haunted, a precursory view on ideas he developed in Specters of Marx (1993) a decade later, to a non-linear experimentation with image and sound, evoking the confrontation with dualism, materialism and form, enabled by the ghost’s passing into the present from a past that never was.

This screening will conclude with a Q&A with the director Ken McMullen and collaborator Oscar Guardiola-Rivera on the enduring influence of the ghost in contemporary memory, recent technological changes and the ghost’s lingering presence within those, and the notion of the ghost as the disruptor of narrative and linearity.

Ken McMullen is a film director, artist, and Professor of Film at Kingston University London. He has produced and directed more than 50 motion picture works, including major international feature films such as Zina (1985), 1871 (1987) and Hamlet Within (2022). Oscar Guardiola-Rivera is a writer, philosopher, cultural critic, and Professor of Human Rights and Political Philosophy at Birkbeck Law School. He is the author of the critically acclaimed What If Latin America Ruled the World? (Bloomsbury, 2010) and Story of a Death Foretold (Bloomsbury, 2013).


Leave a comment

Announcement: phi-net, an early career network for philosophy and critical theory funded by CHASE-AHRC

We are pleased to announce the establishment of phi-net, an early career network for philosophy and critical theory funded by CHASE-AHRC and co-hosted by CPCT and the Birkbeck Institute for the Moving Image (BIMI).

As disciplines whose sources and references point to contributions to wider intellectual histories, philosophy and critical theory continue to influence and reflect interdisciplinarity in fields across the arts and the humanities. The CHASE Early Career Network for Philosophy and Critical Theory (phi-net) provides a forum for engaging with and preserving the spirit of this collective exchange with a view to adapting and incorporating perspectives from its guests and participants and to supporting ongoing interdisciplinary research in doctoral and early-career researcher communities.

Provocation for 2026-27: Against Frictionlessness

phi-net’s programme for AY 2026-27 considers friction and frictionlessness through three lenses: ecology, capital, and poetics. Taking up objects, super-objects, flesh, spectres, parasites, diamonds, shipping containers, seams, data, rhetoric, ground, and the other, we ask: how can we grasp friction as an affective, aesthetic, or ontological category? And how has its classification evolved up to our historical-critical present? How does philosophy and critical theory account for desires for and aversions to friction? How does friction(lessness) figure in our political ideals and alternatives, in our hopes and fears? Collaborators on our programme so far include Prof. Ken McMullen (Kingston), Prof. Oscar Guardiola-Rivera (Birkbeck) and Prof. Esther Leslie (Birkbeck), with more to be announced soon.

phi-net’s programme provides an opportunity for training and development for all CHASE (Consortium for the Humanities and the Arts South-east England) researchers seeking to adopt topics and methods in philosophy and critical theory into their research, including researcher-led workshops, film screenings, and an annual postgraduate conference. Our programme is organised in collaboration with the Centre for Philosophy and Critical Thought (CPCT) at Goldsmiths, University of London and the Birkbeck Institute for the Moving Image (BIMI). We are supported by the CHASE doctoral training partnership.

phi-net is co-coordinated by Anna Titov (University of East Anglia, Philosophy), Grace Marshall (Birkbeck, History) and Jack Morson (Goldsmiths, Literary and Critical Theory).

To join our mailing list, or to express interest in contributing to the Network’s activities, please contact: chasephinet@gmail.com


Leave a comment

CPCT Research Seminar 2026-27: ‘Yet Another Machine for Producing Gods’

Image: UBahn station in Essen, Germany, artwork by anonymous students at the Hochschule der bildenden Künste, 2026


We’re pleased to announce the commencement of our Research Seminar this year, which is devoted to working towards a critical philosophy of AI and which we have entitled ‘Yet Another Machine for Producing Gods.’ This year’s Seminar is convened by CPCT’s Critical AI Network. We’re holding the Seminar online this year so you can join us via Zoom. Please visit https://cpct.uk/2026-2027/ for more details, including a detailed seminar plan, links to the readings, and the Zoom registration link. Free and open to the public as per usual.


Leave a comment

Book Launch: Jordi Maiso’s ‘From Damaged Life’

Please join us for the launch of Jordi Maiso’s book ‘From Damaged Life: The Critical Theory of Theodor W. Adorno’ with Peter Osborne (CRMEP), Svenja Bromberg (Goldsmiths) and Andrés Saenz de Sicilia (Northeastern). It is organised by the Centre for Philosophy and Critical Theory (CPCT) at Goldsmiths, University of London.

Friday, 9 Oct 2026, 17:00 – 19:00

Central Saint Martins, Granary Building

1 Granary Square, Kings Cross, London, N1C 4AA

Room: D115

*NB – this event will take place at Central Saint Martins Granary Square building due to ongoing industrial action at Goldsmiths. Room information will be added shortly. Registration is essential*

Attendance is free, but registration is essential: https://damagedlife.eventbrite.com

About the book:

‘From Damaged Life: The Critical Theory of Theodor W. Adorno’ is a timely intervention in contemporary debates on critical theory, the critique of capitalism, authoritarianism, and social regression. Moving beyond interpretations that confine Adorno primarily to aesthetics or negative dialectics, the book reconstructs his thought as a historically grounded critical theory of advanced capitalism, rooted in the catastrophic experiences of fascism, Auschwitz, and the consolidation of new forms of domination.

At the centre of Maiso’s interpretation lies Adorno’s concept of “damaged life,” understood as a framework for analysing the social production of suffering, the anthropological transformation of subjectivity, and the persistence of unfreedom under conditions of total socialization. Rearticulating Adorno in close relation to Marx’s critique of political economy, the book foregrounds his relevance for analysing fetishism, culture industry, ideological transformation, authoritarian potential, and the blocked horizons of emancipation in contemporary capitalist societies.

About the author:

Jordi Maiso is Associate Professor at the Complutense University of Madrid. His work focuses on Frankfurt School Critical Theory and its contemporary relevance, particularly the thought of Theodor W. Adorno. Bringing together Critical Theory and the critique of political economy, his research examines the social constitution of subjectivity and the transformations of social experience under advanced capitalism. He has published extensively on Critical Theory, aesthetics, social philosophy, the mutations of the culture industry, and authoritarianism. Maiso is Editor-in-Chief of Constelaciones. Revista de Teoría Crítica, Chair of the Spanish Society for Critical Theory Studies (SETC), and a member of the Editorial Board of the Journal of Adorno Studies.


Leave a comment

PARTNER EVENT: Shakespeare and Interwar British Philosophy (1918-1939) – 27 June 2026 (London; hybrid)


Shakespeare in Philosophy (ShiP), one of CPCT’s local external partners, cordially invites you to this year’s symposium: 

Shakespeare and Interwar British Philosophy (1918-1939) – 27 June 2026, Garrick’s Temple to Shakespeare, Hampton, UK


Tickets available via Eventbrite.

Famously described as the Twenty Years Crisis by the international relations historian E.H. Carr, the period between the First and Second World Wars was an important moment in British philosophy, theatre and culture. This symposium considers Shakespeare and his plays in relation to the developments in intellectual life in Britain in this period. Papers include discussions of Bertrand Russell, Ludwig Wittgenstein, J.L. Austin, John Maynard Keynes, and A.N. Whitehead. A closing panel discusses Richard Wilson’s 2025 book, Shakespeare’s Fascist Followers: Modern Friends. Speakers include Sarah Beckwith, Martin Harries, Christoph Schuringa, and Michael Witmore.

Preliminary programme:


10-11 h

Welcome and Introduction

Christoph Schuringa: Russell, Wittgenstein, Shakespeare



11-11:30 h

Coffee/tea



11:30-13 h

Sarah Beckwith: Austin’s Shakespeare, Shakespeare’s Austin: Tragedy and Moral Encounter

Martin Harries: Keynes on Art and the State



13-15 h

Lunch



15-15:45 h

Michael Witmore: Shakespeare and Whitehead: Two Philosophers of Eventuality (Zoom)



15:45-16:00 h

Coffee/tea



16:00-18:00 h
Panel on “Shakespeare’s Fascist Followers” (with Jessica Chiba, Richard Ashby, Jennifer Rust and Timo Uotinen), and Roundtable discussion

About the series: 

Shakespeare in Philosophy (ShiP) is a non-profit symposium series exploring the relation between Shakespeare and the philosophical work that has taken inspiration from his oeuvre. Its goal is to create a space for dialogue and discussion involving Shakespeare scholarship, wider philosophical and socio-political issues, and the general public. Events are held in collaboration with Garrick’s Temple to Shakespeare at the Temple built by the pre-eminent actor David Garrick beside the Thames in 1756.

All proceeds go to the Temple.
 
This event has been made possible through the generous support of The Royal Institute of Philosophy Local Partners scheme.

For more information, please visit https://shakespeareinphilosophy.org/. 


Leave a comment

CANCELLED: Book panel on ‘The Cultural Marxism Conspiracy – Why the Right Blames the Frankfurt School for the Decline of the West’ by A.J.A. Woods with Larne Abse Gogarty, Annie Kelly and Georgios Samaras

– THIS EVENT WILL BE RESCHEDULED DUE TO TUBE STRIKE AND ILLNESS –

Book panel on ‘The Cultural Marxism Conspiracy – Why the Right Blames the Frankfurt School for the Decline of the West’ by A.J.A. Woods with Larne Abse Gogarty , Annie Kelly and Georgios Samaras

Tuesday, 2 June 2026 
6-8pm
Goldsmiths, Room RHB 137

Free and open to all.

Panelists:

A.J.A. Woods is an intellectual historian who lives in Brighton, England. Their first book, The Cultural Marxism Conspiracy: Why the Right Blames the Frankfurt School for the Decline of the West, was released by Verso Books in April 2026. Their previous writings on the Frankfurt School and the far right have been translated into four languages and published in Open Democracy, Marx & Philosophy Review of Books, Public Seminar, & Patterns of Prejudice. They are a member of the ecosocialist group Anti*Capitalist Resistance. 

Larne Abse Gogarty is a writer and art historian from London. She is an associate professor at the Slade School of Fine Art, University College London. Larne is the author of two books: What We Do Is Secret: Contemporary Art and the Antinomies of Conspiracy (Sternberg Press, 2023) and Usable Pasts: Social Practice and State Formation in American Art (Brill, 2022) Currently, she is working on a new project about recent sculpture and commodity culture through the lens of salvage and scavenging. Larne has written catalogue essays for artists including Sam Gilliam, Alice Neel, and Gray Wielebinski and regularly writes criticism, mainly for Art Monthly. In 2026, she curated an exhibition entitled Conspiracies at the Warburg Institute, London. She is in the editorial group for Selva journal and Oxford Art Journal. 

Annie Kelly is a journalist and researcher specialising in digital antifeminism, conspiracy theories and the far right. She completed her PhD about digital antifeminist networks at the University of East Anglia in 2020 and worked as a postdoctoral researcher on the AHRC-funded “Everything is Connected: Conspiracy Theories in the Age of the Internet” project at King’s College London. She is the UK correspondent for the QAA Podcast (formerly QAnon Anonymous). 

Dr Georgios Samaras is Assistant Professor of Public Policy at King’s College London. His research focuses on European and American politics, with particular attention to how far-right ideas move from the margins into the mainstream and what that shift means for democratic governance. He is a Research Associate at the LSE Hellenic Observatory and at ENA Institute, an advisory board member at ETERON, and a member of the Reactionary Politics Research Network. He has written for The Guardian, POLITICO, The Independent, the New Statesman and Jacobin. His debut book, The Long Shadow of Golden Dawn, is forthcoming with Palgrave Macmillan/Springer Nature in 2026.

About the book:

“Cultural Marxism” is one of the far right’s favorite buzzwords. But despite its currency, the meaning and origins of the term are rarely investigated. This book uncovers the bizarre story of the cult leaders, right-wing intellectuals, and White House officials who believe a coterie of left-wing scholars and students is plotting to undermine Western civilization. Drawing on years of archival research and using the tools of critical theory, A.J.A. Woods reveals how a group of German thinkers known as the Frankfurt School was recast as the sinister orchestra-tors of a global conspiracy. Instead of simply debunking this conspiracy theory, Woods offers a sharp analysis and critique of the political movements that have declared war on all that passes for Cultural Marxism in the US, the UK, and Brazil.
Only when we understand the practices and weaknesses of those reactionaries committed to fighting this illusory threat—a conflict causing real-world damage—can we effectively resist. This is an essential book for anyone seeking to understand the ideological currents shaping politics in the twenty-first century.


Leave a comment

PROGRAMME: “How do we break something that is already broken?” Virtual Assembly of the Critical AI Network, CPCT (27-29 May, 2026; online)



We are pleased to announce the programme for CAIN-CPCT’s inaugural Virtual Assembly on the question of “How do we break something that is already broken?” The virtual assembly will take place online on 27, 28 and 29 May 2026 from 3:30-8:00pm (UK).

If you would like to attend and have not yet registered, please consider doing so by filling this form. Zoom registration links and pre-circulated papers will be sent to registered attendees.

For a continually updated programme with more information on the speakers and their presentations, please visit this link.

A. AI in Education, AI as Education — Wednesday, 27 May 2026

How has AI been insinuated into education, and in what ways has AI been taken for education itself, overtaking, eliminating, or usurping the civic and/or intellectual purposes of formal and informal learning? What are some of your case studies of local policy and examples of lived experience we might learn from? How might we formulate the most effective counterarguments – and organizing – against the integration of AI into our curricula and delivery that address local policy and financial conditions? 

3:30-3:50 pm
Welcome and Introduction
Julia Ng and Dan McQuillan (CPCT / Goldsmiths)

3:50-4:00 pm
Some Words on the State of Affairs
Jenny Doussan (CPCT / Goldsmiths)

4:00-4:50 pm
Panel 1
Rachel McCarthy (Goldsmiths)
Martha Kenney and Martha Lincoln (San Francisco State University)
Sarah Fitterer, Dominik Gangl and Jannes Ulbrich (Technical University Berlin and the Berlin University of the Arts (UdK)

5:00-5:50 pm
Panel 2
Sanjay Sharma (Warwick)
Zuleika Suliman (University of South Africa)
Jeremy Auerbach (University College Dublin)

6:00-6:50 pm
Panel 3
Gavin Duffy (Goldsmiths)
Anna Traianou (Goldsmiths)
Veli Hillman (Goldsmiths)

7:00-7:20 pm
Keynote A
Helen Beetham

7:20-8:00 pm
Q&A and Discussion


B. AI in and as Law, Governance, and Politics — Thursday, 28 May 2026

As AI creeps into normalised deployment in legal practice, policy articulation, and decision making in the guise of efficiency and accuracy, questions have yet to be posed about the impact on labour conditions and labour law, the status of evidence, the right to refuse, and the rights of those affected by AI-facilitated decisions, to name just a few. Moreover, the extent to which AI is being used to manipulate democratic elections via data harvesting, psychographic profiling, and micro-targeting, amongst other strategies, has raised seemingly unanswerable questions about the future of democracy. Indeed, is politics even possible in the age of AI? How might we set about articulating and answering some of these questions? How might we question the role of governance, whether of the state or of the institution, in mediating and facilitating the introduction of AI into all facets of our lives? 

4:00-4:50 pm
Panel 1
Jake Goldenfein and Fan Yang (Melbourne Law School)
Dimitra Kotouza (Labour Research Department)
Neal Thomas (Wilfrid Laurier University)

5:00-5:50 pm
Panel 2
Brett Zehner (Exeter)
Freya Van den Boom (Antwerp)
Eric Brown (Corvinus University of Budapest)

6:00-6:50 pm
Panel 3
Jeannette Eicks (The Colleges of Law)
Conor Heaney and Connal Parsley (Kent Law School)
Ana Fernandez-Aballi (Groningen)

7:00-7:20 pm
Keynote B
Dan McQuillan (Goldsmiths)

7:20-8:00 pm
Q&A and Discussion


C. The Ecology of AI, AI and the Environment — Friday, 29 May 2026

Guided by the premise that under the hood, AI is simply the same technology whether it is being introduced into education or other domains of life, we ask how we might articulate and analyze the relations forged by AI between vastly different areas that hitherto appeared to be unconnected. What insights might be gained from situating AI within an ecology? How does AI compete with others in this ecology for natural resources, and what can be done to mitigate, contain, or reverse this impact? If, as we propose, AI should be evaluated not as a tool with a use value but rather as the latest symptom of misused infrastructures, how might we articulate the counterproductivity that AI adoption represents within its ecology for any green policy? 

4:00-4:50 pm
Panel 1
Jiayi Young (University of California, Davis)
Mariana Marangoni (University of the Arts London)
Mattia Paginelli (Goldsmiths)

5:00-5:50 pm
Panel 2
Chiara Haefliger (Goldsmiths)
Nicholas Lawrence (Warwick)
Jordan Kinder (New York University)

6:00-6:50 pm
Panel 3
Becky Kazansky (AIDEMOCRACY, Goldsmiths)
Sini Matikainen (London School of Economics)
Hamish van der Ven (University of British Columbia)

7:00-7:20 pm
Keynote C
Fieke Jansen (Amsterdam)

7:20-8:00 pm
Q&A and Discussion

8:00-8:30 pm
General Assembly Meeting — next steps?


Leave a comment

Iain Campbell, ‘John Cage, Gilles Deleuze, and the Practice of Experimentation’ (Friday, 8th May, 5pm, in person and online)

a special session of our CPCT Research Seminar 2025-26
‘Music and Philosophy’

Time: Friday, 8 May 2026, 5:00-7:00 pm UK time.
Venue: RHB 138 and online

Zoom registration: https://gold-ac-uk.zoom.us/meeting/register/mUYqPLVRQO6eqQdsp534BQ

Free and open to all.

About the talk:

In the twentieth century it became common to speak of experimentation beyond its traditional domain of scientific research, with discourses on the ‘experimental’ appearing across the arts and humanities. In the twenty-first century, ‘experimentation’ has been widely theorised as a means of performing interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. However, with this expansion across domains, experimentation has become a sometimes diffuse and vague notion. Here I approach this issue through two figures who have come to stand for the imperative to experiment: the composer John Cage and the philosopher Gilles Deleuze.

Cage, as an experimental composer, is characterised by his embrace of the uncertain and unforeseen. Chance procedures, the incorporation of unintended sound, and the development of new notational schemes are among the means he adopted in order to break down conventional models of composition, performance, and listening. Deleuze, as an experimental philosopher, is likewise taken to value creativity and transformation, a ‘becoming’ that arises through a thorough challenge to any and all hierarchies, dualisms, and foundations. Thought and practice are not driven by pre-given norms or grounded in solid foundations, but rather proceed from the problematisation of encounters that exceed recognition or categorisation.

Yet ideals of experimentation and the practice of experimentation do not always match up: critics have argued that anti-method principles such as Cage’s ‘purpose to remove purposes’ bring the risk of obscuring where control and domination are still active; that the uncertainty the experimenter proclaims masks a deeper certainty. The wager of my project then, is that by staging an encounter between these two figures, and the two domains they occupy, we can reach a new understanding of what it means, has meant, and can mean to experiment in, between, and beyond music and philosophy.

Speaker bio:

Iain Campbell is a writer and researcher based in Glasgow, Scotland. He works on topics across philosophy, music, sound studies, and modern and contemporary art, with a particular interest in continental philosophy and experimental music. His academic writing has been published in venues including parallax, Continental Philosophy Review, and Contemporary Music Review, and he has had art criticism published in venues including Burlington Contemporary. His most recent academic position was as Lecturer in Modern and Contemporary Art History at the University of Edinburgh, and he has also worked at the University of Brighton and the University of Dundee. His book John Cage, Gilles Deleuze, and the Practice of Experimentation is forthcoming with Edinburgh University Press.


Leave a comment

Book launch – Abolishing Capitalist Totality – Thurs, 9 April, 3-5pm, Goldsmiths, Room RHB 137

Book launch – with Anthony Iles, Mattin, Rob Lucas, Andrés Saenz de Sicilia, Svenja Bromberg

Abolishing Capitalist Totality: What is to be Done under Real Subsumption?
Edited by Anthony Iles & Mattin (published by Minor Compositions, 2026)

Thursday, 9 April 2026
15:00 – 17:00
Goldsmiths, RHB room 137 (in person only)
Organised by the Centre for Philosophy and Critical Thought
Free and open to all

About the book
The concept of subsumption informs an account of how capital seizes hold of social forms and shapes them to its ends. Subsumption can also help us describe what is shaped by capital and what is used as found, therefore how we might meaningfully begin to distinguish between thought processes and social processes, between capital as a seemingly self-perfecting system and the contradictory realities and inequalities of capitalist society. This anthology combines new translations of seminal communist theory from the archives, poetic interventions and recent critical exchanges which each contribute to a radical reconstruction of the concepts of subsumption, self-abolition, communisation and capitalist totality. What has been perceived in recent years as an enclosed capitalist totality is, in fact, composed of concrete processes that we can act upon: how we understand capitalism determines how we abolish capital.

With Contributions by: Sean Bonney, Nadia Bou Ali, Anne Boyer, Ray Brassier, Federico Corriente, Andrei Chitu, Loss Choi, Luisa Lorenza Corna, Bolívar Echeverría, Endnotes, Neil Gray, Danny Hayward, Em Hedditch, Anthony Iles, Lisa Jeschke, Sacha Kahir, Jessika Khazrik, Dimitra Kotouza, Rob Lucas, Mattin, Négation, Andrés Saenz de Sicilia, Roland Simon, Théorie Communiste, Marina Vishmidt.

About the editors
Anthony Iles is a book editor and writer based in London. He
is a founding member of Full Unemployment Cinema and a Contributing Editor with Mute since 2005. He
is the author, with Josephine Berry, of the book No Room to Move: Art and the Regenerate City (2011), co-author, with Tom Roberts, of All Knees and Elbows (2012).

Mattin is an artist, musician, and theorist working conceptually with noise and improvisation. Through his practice and pedagogy, he explores performative forms of estrangement as a way of engaging with structural alienation. He is the author of Social Dissonance (2022) and, together with Anthony Iles, co-edited Noise & Capitalism (2009). He runs the podcast Social Discipline with Miguel Prado, and both are members of Noise Research Union (NRU).


1 Comment

CfP: “How do we break something that is already broken?” Virtual Assembly of the Critical AI Network, CPCT (27-29 May 2026)

How do we break something that is already broken?

Virtual Assembly of the Critical AI Network, 27-29 May 2026
Centre for Philosophy and Critical Thought, Goldsmiths, University of London

Let us begin with our premise: AI is a broken technology. Despite the many hubristic claims made by its proprietary owners and amplified by the media, AI has no way to deliver on its promises to bring about societal benefits for all by increasing productivity, lowering costs, and accelerating innovation. Yet the rhetoric that surrounds AI’s incursions into our worlds of work and life has acted persuasively to cover for widespread precaritisation. Meanwhile, AI’s shoddy predictions and slop production further harm the marginalised and its immense resource demands hasten the destruction of the environment. Might we therefore not speculate that AI’s purpose is actually to break things by virtue of its very brokenness, not least any irksome movements towards racial, gender, class, or climate justice? 

AI may not be the cause of our current polycrisis but it condenses the forces that brought them about, which it then amplifies, intensifies, and adds to. A critical approach to AI rejects the inevitability of this state of affairs. Instead, a critical approach recognises AI as merely the latest broken product of an already broken system, peddled under a techno-utopian guise in a desperate attempt to persuade us that energy-guzzling machine gods are our only hope out of our predicament. We therefore posit that the entangled dynamics of AI are useful diagrams of the economic, political, and ideological syndromes that lie beneath. AI’s stuttering operations dredge up misshapen philosophies, colonial dreams and a reactionary contempt for relations of care, and put them on full display. Our approach to AI asks how we break this brokenness. How can we who are forced to inhabit the dysfunction that AI names resist AI, recompose liveable lives from within the wreckage of computational nihilism, and craft its distortions into infrastructures for the common good?

Open Call for Participants: Critical AI Virtual Assembly

This assembly is an initiative of the Critical AI Network and our email list will be the main communication channel for it. If you are interested in taking part, either as a contributor or a participant, please sign up to the list here:  https://jiscmail.ac.uk/CPCT-CRITICALAINETWORK.

The virtual assembly will take place online on 27, 28 and 29 May 2026 from 4-8pm (UK). For this inaugural event, we have identified three domains of inquiry to explore as a first step: 

A. AI in Education, AI as Education — Wednesday, 27 May 2026

How has AI been insinuated into education, and in what ways has AI been taken for education itself, overtaking, eliminating, or usurping the civic and/or intellectual purposes of formal and informal learning? What are some of your case studies of local policy and examples of lived experience we might learn from? How might we formulate the most effective counterarguments – and organizing – against the integration of AI into our curricula and delivery that address local policy and financial conditions? 

B. AI in and as Law, Governance, and Politics — Thursday, 28 May 2026

As AI creeps into normalised deployment in legal practice, policy articulation, and decision making in the guise of efficiency and accuracy, questions have yet to be posed about the impact on labour conditions and labour law, the status of evidence, the right to refuse, and the rights of those affected by AI-facilitated decisions, to name just a few. Moreover, the extent to which AI is being used to manipulate democratic elections via data harvesting, psychographic profiling, and micro-targeting, amongst other strategies, has raised seemingly unanswerable questions about the future of democracy. Indeed, is politics even possible in the age of AI? How might we set about articulating and answering some of these questions? How might we question the role of governance, whether of the state or of the institution, in mediating and facilitating the introduction of AI into all facets of our lives? 

C. The Ecology of AI, AI and the Environment — Friday, 29 May 2026

Guided by the premise that under the hood, AI is simply the same technology whether it is being introduced into education or other domains of life, we ask how we might articulate and analyze the relations forged by AI between vastly different areas that hitherto appeared to be unconnected. What insights might be gained from situating AI within an ecology? How does AI compete with others in this ecology for natural resources, and what can be done to mitigate, contain, or reverse this impact? If, as we propose, AI should be evaluated not as a tool with a use value but rather as the latest symptom of misused infrastructures, how might we articulate the counterproductivity that AI adoption represents within its ecology for any green policy? 

Our hope is to collect and publish a record of our discussions in a new blog we will be setting up for the network. 

How do I participate?

Our working premise is that by virtue of having our data mined and colluding with the training of models with or without remuneration or consent, **we are all data workers in the age of AI**. Anyone who is a data worker in this sense is invited to participate. 

There are three ways to be a part of this assembly: 

(i) We invite you to contribute short (10 minute) position papers falling within one of the domains above. We welcome and value ‘non-academic’ contributions such as local case studies, reflections on personal experience, reports from activists, amongst others. We especially encourage submissions from underrepresented voices. In order to maximize accessibility, papers will be precirculated and panel speakers will present them briefly, followed by discussion. Papers have the option of being published on our blog. 

(ii) We invite non-presenting attendees to consider participating as a note-taker at one of the sessions, with your notes published afterwards in a distilled and narrative form on our blog. 

(iii) We invite you to attend any number of our panels as a discussant. 

If you would like to be a part of the assembly, please fill out the form at https://forms.gle/McxCu65qz2ymBepS8 to send us: 

  1. Your preferred mode of participation ((i) presenter; (ii) note-taker; (iii) discussant). 
  2. If you selected (i) or (ii), please indicate which domain (A. AI in Education, AI as Education (27 May 2026); B. AI in and as Law, Governance, and Politics (28 May 2026); C. The Ecology of AI, AI and the Environment (29 May 2026)) you would like to either present or take notes in.
  3. If you selected (i), please include a max. 250w abstract of the paper you would like to present.
  4. Finally, for all participants, please include a brief 100w bio that includes your (academic or non-academic) institutional affiliation and position (e.g., student, professor, IT worker, curator, etc.). 

The submission deadline is Friday, 20 March 2026 at 11:59pm. 

How do I join the Critical AI network?

If you have received this CFP and are not already a member of our network, but would like to join and participate in the assembly, please subscribe to our mailing list at https://jiscmail.ac.uk/CPCT-CRITICALAINETWORK. 

Who do I contact if I have questions?

If you have questions, feel free to get in touch with the organisers: 

Dan Mcquillan (Computing) d.mcquillan [at] gold.ac.uk
Julia Ng (Literary Studies) j.ng [at] gold.ac.uk
Andres Saenz de Sicilia (Sociology) a.saenzdesicilia [at] gold.ac.uk 
Deirdre Daly (CALL) d.daly [at] gold.ac.uk
Jenny Doussan (Visual Cultures) j.doussan [at] gold.ac.uk 
Scott Wark (Visual Cultures) s.wark [at] gold.ac.uk